USA & Canada: Sunday, October 12, 2008, 2:44:18 PM (Central)
Pakistan: Monday, October 13, 2008, 1:44:18 AM
Pakistan Earthquake
Human Development Foundation
Pakistan Earthquake
 

 
Pak Newsletter
Name

E-mail



Archive
 
Pak Toolbar
Pakistan Alert Network
Personal Calendar
YesPakistan.com Chat!
Pak Weather!
Send Urdu Email!
Currency Converter

Compare Phone Rates

 
Pak Search
 
Your Opinion Counts
Why is making new year resolutions important to you?
Helps me stay focused on my goals and vision in life
Helps me renew my spirit to improve myself and others
It's the tradition of the Prophet (pbuh) & successful people
Helps me evaluate my progress, success & failures
 
 
If two parties of the believers fight, put things right between them...set things right between them equitably...the believers are indeed brothers; so set things right between your two brothers. Quran 49:8.
Human
Development
Foundation

PROJECT PAKISTAN


EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

This document is intended as advice on the future strategy and program of Project Pakistan of the Human Development Foundation of North America (HDFNA). It is the result of collaboration between HDFNA and the Sustainable Development Policy Institute (SDPI), in accordance with the terms of reference agreed upon between the two institutions. Given the specific goal of the paper, the focus is exclusively on Project Pakistan. In particular, none of the other existing or prospective activities of the Foundation are addressed here.

This report follows upon an earlier report prepared for HDFNA by the Regional Institute of Management, Islamabad (March 1998), which focused on the characteristics of the various prospective partner institutions of HDFNA. We go beyond the earlier report in identifying the range of strategic options available to HDFNA to carry out its mission, sketching the pros and cons of the various alternatives in order to recommend the most desirable strategy, and chalking out a plan of operation and an investment strategy for the recommended strategy.

Chapter 1 focuses on questions of broad vision. It provides a background for the study, including a review of the human development situation in Pakistan, an assessment of various actions to improve socio-economic conditions, and the prospective role or roles that a relatively new organization can play in supporting such actions. Chapter 2 expands upon this to outline the salient features and pros and cons of the various options available to HDFNA as it plans the nature of its intervention. It goes on to recommend a subset of these options as the most feasible and desirable within the given constraints. Chapter 3 transforms these recommendations into a plan of operation, with a clearly delineated timetable for steps to be taken in the immediate future. It outlines the operational details of issues related to program design, partnership mechanisms, governance structure, monitoring and evaluation, and communication. Finally, Chapter 4 provides the elements of an investment strategy corresponding to the plan of operation presented in Chapter 3.

A brief review of experience with development interventions in Pakistan suggests that successful programs are those that command widespread legitimacy. These have some clearly discernible features. They are generally led by Pakistanis, and associated in peoples' minds with highly respected individuals. They focus on capacity building rather than on a purely external assessment of needs. They include a strong effort at communication of results in a transparent manner. Finally, they build on the work of other organizations rather than as a solo effort. We recommend the above broad directions for HDFNA.

Beyond this, however, there are differences between various courses of action available to HDFNA. We organize the discussion of these alternatives by using the nature of partnership as a defining characteristic. In our discussions, we find four alternative models or approaches available to HDFNA: the 'go it alone' approach, the donor approach, the collaborative approach, and the facilitation approach. The first two are fairly obvious from their names. The thrid refers to an approach in which HDFNA reaches an agreement with a number of NGOs to work together in a project area, thus building on each others' strengths, and introducing a new model of action in Pakistan. The fourth goes beyond the third approach in requiring HDFNA to take responsibility for the selected area, and coordinating the work of NGOs as well as government agencies. Each of these alternatives has its own strength and weaknesses. After discussing the pros and cons of each, and evaluating them according to a set of nine criteria, we recommend that HDFNA should start with the collaboration (or partnership) approach, but aim in the long run to work according to the facilitation approach.

Within this approach, we propose an integrated set of actions on human development, covering health, education, and poverty eradication, using the expertise of existing NGOs. In addition, we propose a concerted program of research-based monitoring and evaluation, and communication. To this end, we propose the involvement of HDC to prepare a local HDI, that of Aurat Foundation to oversee and monitor gender awareness work, and SDPI to organize a research based monitoring of social and empowerment variables.

This discussion is followed by a set of recommendations on the course of action to be undertaken immediately in order to put the plan in motion. We suggest a five year program, starting with agreements with potential partners, registration of a subsidiary organization in Pakistan, selection of a project site, appointment of a national coordinator and a project coordinator, selection of an Advisory Board, and a formal launch of the project in January 1999. We also outline the mechanisms through which additional sites will be selected in the future. We suggest that work should start in one project area, defined as a tehsil, expand to another one by the end of the first year, and to a third site in year 2. Beyond this, however, additional sites should be added only if additional resources are available.

Finally, we propose an investment plan to translate this program into reality. We suggest that over the next five years HDFNA should commit itself to raising and investing at least $1.25 million in the project. This works out to an average of $250,000 per year. However, we recommend that this investment be 'front-loaded', in other words, the highest investment of $350,000 would be made in the first year when capital costs are high, followed by $300,000 in year 2, and $200,000 in each of three remaining years. The investment plan provides a simple budget for the expenditure to be undertaken on field activities and on the national office and support activities.

Date/Time Last Modified: 6/17/2002 4:30:48 PM

Bookmark this page Tell-a-Friend SiteMap Print

© 2004, Human Development Foundation. All rights reserved.
1350 Remington Road, Suite W, Schaumburg, Il. 60173
Toll Free: (800) 705-1310 | Email: info@yespakistan.com | Privacy Policy