|
The
Conception of God and the Meaning of Prayer
The rise and growth of
atomism in Islam - the first important indication of an intellectual revolt
against the Aristotelian idea of a fixed universe - forms one of the most interesting
chapters in the history of Muslim thought. The views of the school of BaÄrah
were first shaped by AbëH«shim10 (A.D. 933) and those of the school
of Baghdad by that most exact and daring theological thinker, AbëBakr B«qil«nâ11
(A.D.1013). Later in the beginning of the thirteenth century we find a thoroughly
systematic description in a book called the Guide of the Perplexed by Moses
Maimonides– a Jewish theologian who was educated in the Muslim universities
of Spain.12 A French translation of this book was made by Munk in
1866, and recently Professor Macdonald of America has given an excellent account
of its contents in the Isis from which Dr. Zwemer has reprinted it in
The Moslem World of January 1928.13 Professor Macdonald, however,
has made no attempt to discover the psychological forces that determined the
growth of atomistic kal«m in Islam. He admits that there is nothing like the
atomism of Islam in Greek thought, but, unwilling as he is to give any credit
for original thought to Muslim thinkers,14 and finding a surface
resemblance between the Islamic theory and the views of a certain sect of Buddhism,
he jumps to the conclusion that the origin of the theory is due to Buddhistic
influences on the thought of Islam.15 Unfortunately, a full discussion
of the sources of this purely speculative theory is not possible in this lecture.
I propose only to give you some of its more salient features, indicating at
the same time the lines on which the work of reconstruction in the light of
modern physics ought, in my opinion, to proceed.
According to the Ash‘arite
school of thinkers, then, the world is compounded of what they call jaw«hir–
infinitely small parts or atoms which cannot be further divided. Since the
creative activity of God is ceaseless the number of the atoms cannot be finite.
Fresh atoms are coming into being every moment, and the universe is therefore
constantly growing. As the Qur’«n says: ‘God adds to His creation
what He wills.’16 The essence of the atom is independent of
its existence. This means that existence is a quality imposed on the atom by
God. Before receiving this quality the atom lies dormant, as it were, in the
creative energy of God, and its existence means nothing more than Divine energy
become visible. The atom in its essence, therefore, has no magnitude; it has
its position which does not involve space. It is by their aggregation that atoms
become extended and generate space.17 Ibn Àazm, the critic of atomism,
acutely remarks that the language of the Qur’«n makes no difference in
the act of creation and the thing created. What we call a thing, then, is in
its essential nature an aggregation of atomic acts. Of the concept of ‘atomic
act’, however, it is difficult to form a mental picture. Modern physics
too conceives as action the actual atom of a certain physical quantity. But,
as Professor Eddington has pointed out, the precise formulation of the Theory
of Quanta of action has not been possible so far; though it is vaguely believed
that the atomicity of action is the general law and that the appearance of electrons
is in some way dependent on it.18
Again we have seen that
each atom occupies a position which does not involve space. That being so, what
is the nature of motion which we cannot conceive except as the atom’s passage
through space? Since the Ash‘arite regarded space as generated by the aggregation
of atoms, they could not explain movement as a body’s passage through all
the points of space intervening between the point of its start and destination.
Such an explanation must necessarily assume the existence of void as an independent
reality. In order, therefore, to get over the difficulty of empty space, Naïï«m
resorted to the notion of ñafrah or jump; and imagined the moving body,
not as passing through all the discrete positions in space, but as jumping over
the void between one position and another. Thus, according to him, a quick motion
and a slow motion possess the same speed; but the latter has more points of
rest.19 I confess I do not quite understand this solution of the
difficulty. It may, however, be pointed out that modern atomism has found a
similar difficulty and a similar solution has been suggested. In view of the
experiments relating to Planck’s Theory of Quanta, we cannot imagine the
moving atom as continuously traversing its path in space. ‘One of the most
hopeful lines of explanation’, says Professor Whitehead in his Science
and the Modern World,
‘is to assume that
an electron does not continuously traverse its path in space. The alternative
notion as to its mode of existence is that it appears at a series of discrete
positions in space which it occupies for successive durations of time. It is
as though an automobile, moving at the average rate of thirty miles an hour
along a road, did not traverse the road continuously, but appeared successively
at the successive milestones’ remaining for two minutes at each milestone.’20
Another feature of this
theory of creation is the doctrine of accident, on the perpetual creation of
which depends the continuity of the atom as an existent. If God ceases to create
the accidents, the atom ceases to exist as an atom.21 The atom possesses
inseparable positive or negative qualities. These exist in opposed couples,
as life and death, motion and rest, and possess practically no duration. Two
propositions follow from this: (i) Nothing has a stable nature. (ii) There is
a single order of atoms, i.e. what we call the soul is either a finer kind of
matter, or only an accident.
I am inclined to think
that in view of the idea of continuous creation which the Ash‘arite intended
to establish there is an element of truth in the first proposition. I have said
before that in my opinion the spirit of the Qur’«n is on the whole anti-classical.22
I regard the Ash‘arite thought on this point as a genuine effort to develop
on the basis of an Ultimate Will or Energy a theory of creation which, with
all its shortcomings, is far more true to the spirit of the Qur’«n than
the Aristotelian idea of a fixed universe.23 The duty of the future
theologians of Islam is to reconstruct this purely speculative theory, and to
bring it into closer contact with modern science which appears to be moving
in the same direction.
The second proposition
looks like pure materialism. It is my belief that the Ash‘arite view that
the Nafs is an accident is opposed to the real trend of their own theory
which makes the continuous existence of the atom dependent on the continuous
creation of accidents in it. It is obvious that motion is inconceivable without
time. And since time comes from psychic life, the latter is more fundamental
than motion. No psychic life, no time: no time, no motion. Thus it is really
what the Ash‘arites call the accident which is responsible for the continuity
of the atom as such. The atom becomes or rather looks spatialized when it receives
the quality of existence. Regarded as a phase of Divine energy, it is essentially
spiritual. The Nafs is the pure act; the body is only the act become
visible and hence measurable. In fact the Ash‘arite vaguely anticipated
the modern notion of point-instant; but they failed rightly to see the nature
of the mutual relation between the point and the instant. The instant is the
more fundamental of the two; but the point is inseparable from the instant as
being a necessary mode of its manifestation. The point is not a thing, it is
only a sort of looking at the instant. Rëmâ is far more true to the spirit of
Islam than Ghaz«lâ when he says:24
Reality is, therefore,
essentially spirit. But, of course, there are degrees of spirit. In the history
of Muslim thought the idea of degrees of Reality appears in the writings of
Shih«buddân Suhrawardâ Maqtël. In modern times we find it worked out on a much
larger scale in Hegel and, more recently, in the late Lord Haldane’s Reign
of Relativity, which he published shortly before his death.25
I have conceived the Ultimate Reality as an Ego; and I must add now that from
the Ultimate Ego only egos proceed. The creative energy of the Ultimate Ego,
in whom deed and thought are identical, functions as ego-unities. The world,
in all its details, from the mechanical movement of what we call the atom of
matter to the free movement of thought in the human ego, is the self-revelation
of the ‘Great I am’.26 Every atom of Divine energy, however
low in the scale of existence, is an ego. But there are degrees in the expression
of egohood. Throughout the entire gamut of being runs the gradually rising note
of egohood until it reaches its perfection in man. That is why the Qur’«n
declares the Ultimate Ego to be nearer to man than his own neck-vein.27
Like pearls do we live and move and have our being in the perpetual flow of
Divine life.
Thus a criticism, inspired
by the best traditions of Muslim thought, tends to turn the Ash‘arite scheme
of atomism into a spiritual pluralism, the details of which will have to be
worked out by the future theologians of Islam. It may, however, be asked whether
atomicity has a real seat in the creative energy of God, or presents itself
to us as such only because of our finite mode of apprehension. From a purely
scientific point of view I cannot say what the final answer to this question
will be. From the psychological point of view one thing appears to me to be
certain. Only that is, strictly speaking, real which is directly conscious of
its own reality. The degree of reality varies with the degree of the feeling
of egohood. The nature of the ego is such that, in spite of its capacity to
respond to other egos, it is self-centred and possesses a private circuit of
individuality excluding all egos other than itself.28 In this alone
consists its reality as an ego. Man, therefore, in whom egohood has reached
its relative perfection, occupies a genuine place in the heart of Divine creative
energy, and thus possesses a much higher degree of reality than things around
him. Of all the creations of God he alone is capable of consciously participating
in the creative life of his Maker.29 Endowed with the power to imagine
a better world, and to mould what is into what ought to be, the ego in him,
aspires, in the interests of an increasingly unique and comprehensive individuality,
to exploit all the various environments on which he may be called upon to operate
during the course of an endless career. But I would ask you to wait for a fuller
treatment of this point till my lecture on the Immortality and Freedom of the
Ego. In the meantime, I want to say a few words about the doctrine of atomic
time which I think is the weakest part of the Ash‘arite theory of creation.
It is necessary to do so for a reasonable view of the Divine attribute of Eternity.
Page [1,
2, 3, 4, 5]
[See
Notes]
Date/Time Last Modified: 6/18/2002 8:03:14 AM
© 2004, Human Development
Foundation. All rights reserved.
1350 Remington Road, Suite W, Schaumburg, Il. 60173
Toll Free: (800) 705-1310 | Email: info@yespakistan.com
| Privacy Policy
|
