|
The
Conception of God and the Meaning of Prayer (continued)
Further, it is the nature
of the self to maintain itself as a self. For this purpose it seeks knowledge,
self-multiplication, and power, or, in the words of the Qur’«n, ‘the
kingdom that never faileth’. The first episode in the Quranic legend relates
to man’s desire for knowledge, the second to his desire for self-multiplication
and power. In connexion with the first episode it is necessary to point out
two things. Firstly, the episode is mentioned immediately after the verses describing
Adam’s superiority over the angels in remembering and reproducing the names
of things.63 The purpose of these verses, as I have shown before,
is to bring out the conceptual character of human knowledge.64 Secondly,
Madame Blavatsky65 who possessed a remarkable knowledge of ancient
symbolism, tells us in her book, called Secret Doctrine, that with the
ancients the tree was a cryptic symbol for occult knowledge. Adam was forbidden
to taste the fruit of this tree obviously because his finitude as a self, his
sense-equipment, and his intellectual faculties were, on the whole, attuned
to a different type of knowledge, i.e. the type of knowledge which necessitates
the toil of patient observation and admits only of slow accumulation. Satan,
however, persuaded him to eat the forbidden fruit of occult knowledge and Adam
yielded, not because he was elementally wicked, but because being ‘hasty’
(‘ajël)66 by nature he sought a short cut to knowledge. The
only way to correct this tendency was to place him in an environment which,
however painful, was better suited to the unfolding of his intellectual faculties.
Thus Adam’s insertion into a painful physical environment was not meant
as a punishment; it was meant rather to defeat the object of Satan who, as an
enemy of man, diplomatically tried to keep him ignorant of the joy of perpetual
growth and expansion. But the life of a finite ego in an obstructing environment
depends on the perpetual expansion of knowledge based on actual experience.
And the experience of a finite ego to whom several possibilities are open expands
only by method of trial and error. Therefore, error which may be described as
a kind of intellectual evil is an indispensable factor in the building up of
experience.
The second episode of the
Quranic legend is as follows:
‘But Satan whispered
him (Adam): said he, O Adam! shall I show thee the tree of Eternity and the
Kingdom that faileth not? And they both ate thereof, and their nakedness appeared
to them, and they began to sew of the leaves of the garden to cover them, and
Adam disobeyed his Lord, and went astray. Afterwards his Lord chose him for
Himself, and was turned towards him, and guided him.’ (20:120-22).
The central idea here is
to suggest life’s irresistible desire for a lasting dominion, an infinite
career as a concrete individual. As a temporal being, fearing the termination
of its career by death, the only course open to it is to achieve a kind of collective
immortality by self-multiplication. The eating of the forbidden fruit of the
tree of eternity is life’s resort to sex-differentiation by which it multiplies
itself with a view to circumvent total extinction. It is as if life says to
death: ‘If you sweep away one generation of living things, I will produce
another’. The Qur’«n rejects the phallic symbolism of ancient art,
but suggests the original sexual act by the birth of the sense of shame disclosed
in Adam’s anxiety to cover the nakedness of his body. Now to live is to
possess a definite outline, a concrete individuality. It is in the concrete
individuality, manifested in the countless varieties of living forms that the
Ultimate Ego reveals the infinite wealth of His Being. Yet the emergence and
multiplication of individualities, each fixing its gaze on the revelation of
its own possibilities and seeking its own dominion, inevitably brings in its
wake the awful struggle of ages. ‘Descend ye as enemies of one another’,
says the Qur’«n.67 This mutual conflict of opposing individualities
is the world-pain which both illuminates and darkens the temporal career of
life. In the case of man in whom individuality deepens into personality, opening
up possibilities of wrongdoing, the sense of the tragedy of life becomes much
more acute. But the acceptance of selfhood as a form of life involves the acceptance
of all the imperfections that flow from the finitude of selfhood. The Qur’«n
represents man as having accepted at his peril the trust of personality which
the heavens, the earth, and the mountains refused to bear:
‘Verily We proposed
to the heavens and to the earth and to the mountains to receive the "trust"
but they refused the burden and they feared to receive it. Man undertook to
bear it, but hath proved unjust, senseless!’ (33:72).
Shall we, then, say no
or yes to the trust of personality with all its attendant ills? True manhood,
according to the Qur’«n, consists in ‘patience under ills and hardships’.68
At the present stage of the evolution of selfhood, however, we cannot understand
the full import of the discipline which the driving power of pain brings. Perhaps
it hardens the self against a possible dissolution. But in asking the above
question we are passing the boundaries of pure thought. This is the point where
faith in the eventual triumph of goodness emerges as a religious doctrine. ‘God
is equal to His purpose, but most men know it not’ (12:21).
I have now explained to
you how it is possible philosophically to justify the Islamic conception of
God. But as I have said before, religious ambition soars higher than the ambition
of philosophy.69 Religion is not satisfied with mere conception;
it seeks a more intimate knowledge of and association with the object of its
pursuit. The agency through which this association is achieved is the act of
worship or prayer ending in spiritual illumination. The act of worship, however,
affects different varieties of consciousness differently. In the case of the
prophetic consciousness it is in the main creative, i.e. it tends to create
a fresh ethical world wherein the Prophet, so to speak, applies the pragmatic
test to his revelations. I shall further develop this point in my lecture on
the meaning of Muslim Culture.70 In the case of the mystic consciousness
it is in the main cognitive. It is from this cognitive point of view that I
will try to discover the meaning of prayer. And this point of view is perfectly
justifiable in view of the ultimate motive of prayer. I would draw your attention
to the following passage from the great American psychologist, Professor William
James:
‘It seems to probable
that in spite of all that "science" may do to the contrary, men will
continue to pray to the end of time, unless their mental nature changes in a
manner which nothing we know should lead us to expect. The impulse to pray is
a necessary consequence of the fact that whilst the innermost of the empirical
selves of a man is a Self of the social sort, it yet can find its only adequate
Socius [its "great companion"] in an ideal world.
‘. . . most men, either
continually or occasionally, carry a reference to it in their breast. The humblest
outcast on this earth can feel himself to be real and valid by means of this
higher recognition. And, on the other hand, for most of us, a world with no
such inner refuge when the outer social self failed and dropped from us would
be the abyss of horror. I say "for most of us", because it is probable
that individuals differ a good deal in the degree in which they are haunted
by this sense of an ideal spectator. It is a much more essential part of the
consciousness of some men than of others. Those who have the most of it are
possibly the most religious men. But I am sure that even those who say they
are altogether without it deceive themselves, and really have it in some degree.’71
Thus you will see that,
psychologically speaking, prayer is instinctive in its origin. The act of prayer
as aiming at knowledge resembles reflection. Yet prayer at its highest is much
more than abstract reflection. Like reflection it too is a process of assimilation,
but the assimilative process in the case of prayer draws itself closely together
and thereby acquires a power unknown to pure thought. In thought the mind observes
and follows the working of Reality; in the act of prayer it gives up its career
as a seeker of slow-footed universality and rises higher than thought to capture
Reality itself with a view to become a conscious participator in its life. There
is nothing mystical about it. Prayer as a means of spiritual illumination is
a normal vital act by which the little island of our personality suddenly discovers
its situation in a larger whole of life. Do not think I am talking of auto-suggestion.
Auto-suggestion has nothing to do with the opening up of the sources of life
that lie in the depths of the human ego. Unlike spiritual illumination which
brings fresh power by shaping human personality, it leaves no permanent life-effects
behind. Nor am I speaking of some occult and special way of knowledge. All that
I mean is to fix your attention on a real human experience which has a history
behind it and a future before it. Mysticism has, no doubt, revealed fresh regions
of the self by making a special study of this experience. Its literature is
illuminating; yet its set phraseology shaped by the thought-forms of a worn-out
metaphysics has rather a deadening effect on the modern mind. The quest after
a nameless nothing, as disclosed in Neo-Platonic mysticism - be it Christian
or Muslim - cannot satisfy the modern mind which, with its habits of concrete
thinking, demands a concrete living experience of God. And the history of the
race shows that the attitude of the mind embodied in the act of worship is a
condition for such an experience. In fact, prayer must be regarded as a necessary
complement to the intellectual activity of the observer of Nature. The scientific
observation of Nature keeps us in close contact with the behaviour of Reality,
and thus sharpens our inner perception for a deeper vision of it. I cannot help
quoting here a beautiful passage from the mystic poet Rëmâ in which he describes
the mystic quest after Reality:72
The Sëfi’s book is
not composed of ink and letters: it is not but a heart white as snow.
The scholar’s possession is pen-marks. What is the Sëfi’s possession?
- foot-marks.
The Sëfi stalks the game like a hunter: he sees the musk-deer’s track and
follows the footprints.
For some while the track of the deer is the proper clue for him, but afterwards
it is the musk-gland of the deer that is his guide.
To go one stage guided by the scent of the musk-gland is better than a hundred
stages of following the track and roaming about.73
The truth is that all search
for knowledge is essentially a form of prayer. The scientific observer of Nature
is a kind of mystic seeker in the act of prayer. Although at present he follows
only the footprints of the musk-deer, and thus modestly limits the method of
his quest, his thirst for knowledge is eventually sure to lead him to the point
where the scent of the musk-gland is a better guide than the footprints of the
deer. This alone will add to his power over Nature and give him that vision
of the total-infinite which philosophy seeks but cannot find. Vision without
power does bring moral elevation but cannot give a lasting culture. Power without
vision tends to become destructive and inhuman. Both must combine for the spiritual
expansion of humanity.
The real object of prayer,
however, is better achieved when the act of prayer becomes congregational. The
spirit of all true prayer is social. Even the hermit abandons the society of
men in the hope of finding, in a solitary abode, the fellowship of God. A congregation
is an association of men who, animated by the same aspiration, concentrate themselves
on a single object and open up their inner selves to the working of a single
impulse. It is a psychological truth that association multiplies the normal
man’s power of perception, deepens his emotion, and dynamizes his will
to a degree unknown to him in the privacy of his individuality. Indeed, regarded
as a psychological phenomenon, prayer is still a mystery; for psychology has
not yet discovered the laws relating to the enhancement of human sensibility
in a state of association. With Islam, however, this socialization of spiritual
illumination through associative prayer is a special point of interest. As we
pass from the daily congregational prayer to the annual ceremony round the central
mosque of Mecca, you can easily see how the Islamic institution of worship gradually
enlarges the sphere of human association.
Prayer, then, whether individual
or associative, is an expression of man’s inner yearning for a response
in the awful silence of the universe. It is a unique process of discovery whereby
the searching ego affirms itself in the very moment of self-negation, and thus
discovers its own worth and justification as a dynamic factor in the life of
the universe. True to the psychology of mental attitude in prayer, the form
of worship in Islam symbolizes both affirmation and negation. Yet, in view of
the fact borne out by the experience of the race that prayer, as an inner act,
has found expression in a variety of forms, the Qur’«n says:
‘To every people have
We appointed ways of worship which they observe. Therefore let them not dispute
this matter with thee, but bid them to thy Lord for thou art on the right way:
but if they debate with thee, then say: God best knoweth what ye do! He will
judge between
you on the Day of Resurrection,
as to the matters wherein ye differ’ (22:67-69).
The form of prayer ought
not to become a matter of dispute.74 Which side you turn your face
is certainly not essential to the spirit of prayer. The Qur’«n is perfectly
clear on this point:
‘The East and West
is God’s: therefore whichever way ye turn, there is the face of God’
(2:115).
‘There is no piety
in turning your faces towards the East or the West, but he is pious who believeth
in God, and the Last Day, and the angels, and the scriptures, and the prophets;
who for the love of God disburseth his wealth to his kindred, and to the orphans,
and the needy, and the wayfarer, and those who ask, and for ransoming; who observeth
prayer, and payeth the legal alms, and who is of those who are faithful to their
engagements when they have engaged in them; and patient under ills and hardships,
in time of trouble: those are they who are just, and those are they who fear
the Lord’ (2:177).
Yet we cannot ignore the
important consideration that the posture of the body is a real factor in determining
the attitude of the mind. The choice of one particular direction in Islamic
worship is meant to secure the unity of feeling in the congregation, and its
form in general creates and fosters the sense of social equality inasmuch as
it tends to destroy the feeling of rank or race superiority in the worshippers.
What a tremendous spiritual revolution will take place, practically in no time,
if the proud aristocratic Brahmin of South India is daily made to stand shoulder
to shoulder with the untouchable! From the unity of the all-inclusive Ego who
creates and sustains all egos follows the essential unity of all mankind.75
The division of mankind into races, nations, and tribes, according to the Qur’«n,
is for purposes of identification only.76 The Islamic form of association
in prayer, therefore, besides its cognitive value, is further indicative of
the aspiration to realize this essential unity of mankind as a fact in life
by demolishing all barriers which stand between man and man.
Page [1,
2, 3, 4, 5]
[See
Notes]
Date/Time Last Modified: 6/18/2002 8:03:19 AM
© 2004, Human Development
Foundation. All rights reserved.
1350 Remington Road, Suite W, Schaumburg, Il. 60173
Toll Free: (800) 705-1310 | Email: info@yespakistan.com
| Privacy Policy
|
