|
The
Spirit of Muslim Culture (continued)
The first important point
to note about the spirit of Muslim culture then is that, for purposes of knowledge,
it fixes its gaze on the concrete, the finite. It is further clear that the
birth of the method of observation and experiment in Islam was due not to a
compromise with Greek thought but to a prolonged intellectual warfare with it.
In fact, the influence of the Greeks who, as Briffault says, were interested
chiefly in theory, not in fact, tended rather to obscure the Muslims’ vision
of the Qur’«n, and for at least two centuries kept the practical Arab temperament
from asserting itself and coming to its own. I want, therefore, definitely to
eradicate the misunderstanding that Greek thought, in any way, determined the
character of Muslim culture. Part of my argument you have seen; part you will
see presently.
Knowledge must begin with
the concrete. It is the intellectual capture of and power over the concrete
that makes it possible for the intellect of man to pass beyond the concrete.
As the Qur’«n says:
‘O company of djinn
and men, if you can overpass the bounds of the heaven and the earth, then overpass
them. But by power alone shall ye overpass them’ (55:33).
But the universe, as a
collection of finite things, presents itself as a kind of island situated in
a pure vacuity to which time, regarded as a series of mutually exclusive moments,
is nothing and does nothing. Such a vision of the universe leads the reflecting
mind nowhere. The thought of a limit to perceptual space and time staggers the
mind. The finite, as such, is an idol obstructing the movement of the mind;
or, in order to overpass its bounds, the mind must overcome serial time and
the pure vacuity of perceptual space. ‘And verily towards thy God is the
limit’, says the Qur’«n.18 This verse embodies one of the
deepest thoughts in the Qur’«n; for it definitely suggests that the ultimate
limit is to be sought not in the direction of stars, but in an infinite cosmic
life and spirituality. Now the intellectual journey towards this ultimate limit
is long and arduous; and in this effort, too, the thought of Islam appears to
have moved in a direction entirely different to the Greeks. The ideal of the
Greeks, as Spengler tells us, was proportion, not infinity. The physical presentness
of the finite with its well-defined limits alone absorbed the mind of the Greeks.
In the history of Muslim culture, on the other hand, we find that both in the
realms of pure intellect and religious psychology, by which term I mean higher
Sufism, the ideal revealed is the possession and enjoyment of the Infinite.
In a culture, with such an attitude, the problem of space and time becomes a
question of life and death. In one of these lectures I have already given you
some idea of the way in which the problem of time and space presented itself
to Muslim thinkers, especially the Ash‘arite. One reason why the atomism
of Democritus never became popular in the world of Islam is that it involves
the assumption of an absolute space. The Ash‘arite were, therefore, driven
to develop a different kind of atomism, and tried to overcome the difficulties
of perceptual space in a manner similar to modern atomism. On the side of Mathematics
it must be remembered that since the days of Ptolemy (A.D. 87-165) till the
time of NaÄâr ñësâ (A.D. 120-74)nobody gave serious thought to the difficulties
of demonstrating the certitude of Euclid’s parallel postulate on the basis
of perceptual space.19 It was ñësâ who first disturbed the calm which
had prevailed in the world of Mathematics for a thousand years; and in his effort
to improve the postulate realized the necessity of abandoning perceptual space.
He thus furnished a basis, however slight, for the hyperspace movement of our
time.20 It was, however, al-Bârënâ who, in his approach to the modern
mathematical idea of function saw, from a purely scientific point of view, the
insufficiency of a static view of the universe. This again is a clear departure
from the Greek view. The function-idea introduces the element of time in our
world-picture. It turns the fixed into the variable, and sees the universe not
as being but as becoming. Spengler thinks that the mathematical idea of function
is the symbol of the West of which ‘no other culture gives even a hint’.21
In view of al-Bârënâ, generalizing Newton’s formula of interpolation from
trignometrical function to any function whatever.22 Spengler’s
claim has no foundation in fact. The transformation of the Greek concept of
number from pure magnitude to pure relation really began with Khw«rizmâs movement
from Arithmetic to Algebra.23 al-Bârënâ took a definite step forward
towards what Spengler describes as chronological number which signifies the
mind’s passage from being to becoming. Indeed, more recent developments
in European mathematics tend rather to deprive time of its living historical
character, and to reduce it to a mere representation of space. That is why Whitehead’s
view of Relativity is likely to appeal to Muslim students more than that of
Einstein in whose theory time loses its character of passage and mysteriously
translates itself into utter space.24a
Side by side with the progress
of mathematical thought in Islam we find the idea of evolution gradually shaping
itself. It was Ja`hiz who was the first to note the changes in bird-life caused
by migrations. Later Ibn Maskawaih who was a contemporary of al-Bârënâ gave
it the shape of a more definite theory, and adopted it in his theological work
- al-Fauz al-Asghar. I reproduce here the substance of his evolutionary
hypothesis, not because of its scientific value, but because of the light which
it throws on the direction in which Muslim thought was moving.
According to Ibn Maskawaih
plant-life at the lowest stage of evolution does not need any seed for its birth
and growth. Nor does it perpetuate its species by means of the seed. This kind
of plant-life differs from minerals only in some little power of movement which
grows in higher forms, and reveals itself further in that the plant spreads
out its branches, and perpetuates its species by means of the seed. The power
of movement gradually grows farther until we reach trees which possess a trunk,
leaves, and fruit. At a higher stage of evolution stand forms of plant-life
which need better soil and climate for their growth. The last stage of development
is reached in vine and date-palm which stand, as it were, on the threshold of
animal life. In the date-palm a clear sex-distinction appears. Besides roots
and fibres it develops something which functions like the animal brain, on the
integrity of which depends the life of the date-palm. This is the highest stage
in the development of plant-life, and a prelude to animal life. The first forward
step towards animal life is freedom from earth-rootedness which is the germ
of conscious movement. This is the initial state of animality in which the sense
of touch is the first, and the sense of sight is the last to appear. With the
development of the senses of animal acquires freedom of movement, as in the
case of worms, reptiles, ants, and bees. Animality reaches its perfection in
the horse among quadrupeds and the falcon among birds, and finally arrives at
the frontier of humanity in the ape which is just a degree below man in the
scale of evolution. Further evolution brings physiological changes with a growing
power of discrimination and spirituality until humanity passes from barbarism
to civilization.24b
But it is really religious
psychology, as in ‘Ir«qâand Khw«jah Muhammad P«rs«,25 which
brings us much nearer to our modern ways of looking at the problem of space
and time. ‘Ir«qâ’s view of time-stratifications I have given you before.26
I will now give you the substance of his view of space.
According to ‘Ir«qâ
the existence of some kind of space in relation to God is clear from the following
verses of the Qur’«n:
‘Dost thou not see
that God knoweth all that is in the heavens and all that is in the earth? Three
persons speak not privately together, but He is their fourth; nor five, but
He is their sixth; nor fewer nor more, but wherever they be He is with them’
(58:7).
‘Ye shall not be employed
in affairs, nor shall ye read a text out of the Qur’«n, nor shall ye do
any work, but We will be witness over you when you are engaged therein; and
the weight of an atom on earth or in heaven escapeth not thy Lord; nor is there
aught27 that is less than this or greater, but it is in the Perspicuous
Book’ (10:61).
‘We created man, and
We know what his soul whispereth to him, and We are closer to him than his neck-vein’
(50:16).
But we must not forget
that the words proximity, contact, and mutual separation which apply to material
bodies do not apply to God. Divine life is in touch with the whole universe
on the analogy of the soul’s contact with the body.28 The soul
is neither inside nor outside the body; neither proximate to nor separate from
it. Yet its contact with every atom of the body is real, and it is impossible
to conceive this contact except by positing some kind of space which befits
the subtleness of the soul. The existence of space in relation to the life of
God, therefore, cannot be denied;29 only we should carefully define
the kind of space which may be predicated of the Absoluteness of God. Now, there
are three kinds of space - the space of material bodies, the space of immaterial
beings, and the space of God.30 The space of material bodies is further
divided into three kinds. First, the space of gross bodies of which we predicate
roominess. In this space movement takes time, bodies occupy their respective
places and resist displacement. Secondly, the space of subtle bodies, e.g. air
and sound. In this space too bodies resist each other, and their movement is
measurable in terms of time which, however, appears to be different to the time
of gross bodies. The air in a tube must be displaced before other air can enter
into it; and the time of sound-waves is practically nothing compared to the
time of gross bodies. Thirdly, we have the space of light. The light of the
sun instantly reaches the remotest limits of the earth. Thus in the velocity
of light and sound time is reduced almost to zero. It is, therefore, clear that
the space of light is different to the space of air and sound. There is, however,
a more effective argument than this. The light of a candle spreads in all directions
in a room without displacing the air in the room; and this shows that the space
of light is more subtle than the space of air which has no entry into the space
of light.31 In view of the close proximity of these spaces, however,
it is not possible to distinguish the one from the other except by purely intellectual
analysis and spiritual experience. Again, in the hot water the two opposites
- fire and water - which appear to interpenetrate each other cannot, in view
of their respective natures, exist in the same space.32 The fact
cannot be explained except on the supposition that the spaces of the two substances,
though closely proximate to each other, are nevertheless distinct. But while
the element of distance is not entirely absent, there is no possibility of mutual
resistance in the space of light. The light of a candle reaches up to a certain
point only, and the lights of a hundred candles intermingle in the same room
without displacing one another.
Having thus described the
spaces of physical bodies possessing various degrees of subtleness ‘Ir«qâ
proceeds briefly to describe the main varieties of space operated upon by the
various classes of immaterial beings, e.g. angels. The element of distance is
not entirely absent from these spaces; for immaterial beings, while they can
easily pass through stone walls, cannot altogether dispense with motion which,
according to ‘Ir«qâ, is evidence of imperfection in spirituality.33
The highest point in the scale of spatial freedom is reached by the human soul
which, in its unique essence, is neither at rest nor in motion.34
Thus passing through the infinite varieties of space we reach the Divine space
which is absolutely free from all dimensions and constitutes the meeting point
of all infinities.35
Page [1,
2, 3]
[See
Notes]
Date/Time Last Modified: 6/18/2002 8:03:33 AM
© 2004, Human Development
Foundation. All rights reserved.
1350 Remington Road, Suite W, Schaumburg, Il. 60173
Toll Free: (800) 705-1310 | Email: info@yespakistan.com
| Privacy Policy
|
