New Thinking on Kashmir: United States of Kashmir
By Burhanuddin Hasan
In the wake of the earthquake disaster in Kashmir (both Azad and Occupied),
people on either side have come closer in times of distress. The sacrosanct
LoC may now be crossed over at five points for the first time in the history
of the Kashmir conflict. This can be a monumental step forward if it is sagaciously
exploited in an atmosphere of goodwill and mutual trust. On the sidelines of
the Saarc Summit in Dhaka, Prime Minister Shaukat Aziz put forward a proposal
before the Indian prime minister to demilitarise the LoC which, he said, would
reduce the "trust deficit" between India and Pakistan. Prime Minister
Manmohan Singh, however, expressed certain security-related reservations.
The president of All-Parties Hurriyat Conference, Mir Waiz Umar Farooq, has
also emphasised that the conflict over the disputed territory of Kashmir can
be resolved only if a pragmatic, realistic and tangible strategy for a durable
solution is adopted. Addressing the Hindustan Times' Leadership Summit on 'New
Thinking on Kashmir' in New Delhi, he exploded a bombshell by publicly proposing
for the first time the setting up of a 'United States of Kashmir' which in other
words means converting both parts of Kashmir into an independent state. As a
prerequisite to the move, the Mir Waiz has charted the following roadmap:
• A phased withdrawal of both Indian and Pakistani troops (including
paramilitary forces) from areas under their respective control.
• In order to do this, it might be necessary to take the first step towards
the reduction of Indian and Pakistani forces from the Kashmir borders.
• The immediate and complete cessation of military, paramilitary and
militant action.
• Withdrawal of the military presence from towns and villages.
• Dismantling of bunkers, watch towers and barricades.
• Releasing of political prisoners.
• Changing cavalier attitudes towards human rights violations, especially
custodial killings.
• Annulling various special repressive laws.
• Restoring the rights of peaceful association, assembly and demonstration.
• Permitting the Kashmiri leadership that favours a negotiated resolution
to travel abroad without hindrance.
• Creating necessary conditions and providing facilities for an intra-Kashmiri
dialogue involving both sides of the ceasefire line.
• Allowing a transitional phase, a phase of detoxification, before decisive
elements are put into effect.
These are indeed very sensible proposals from a representative body which may
provide a logical framework for the solution of the Kashmir dispute. But India
and Pakistan would both have serious reservations about converting Jammu Kashmir
into an independent state.
The reasons are obvious: from the very beginning, India has declared J&K
its atoot ang, and has enshrined it as an integral part of the Indian constitution.
The million-dollar question is: would it be possible for any Indian government
to change this policy, to which India has been adhering for over half a century?
Likewise, some parts of JK have also been a part of Pakistan since the conflict
started, and are strategically very important in the country's geopolitical
scenario. Would Pakistan be willing and able to give them up? The immediate
answer is likely to be 'No'.
In view of these compulsions, it seems next to impossible for Pakistan and
India to accept the proposal put forward by Mir Waiz Umar Farooq. Despite all
the recent goodwill and friendly vibes between India and Pakistan, Kashmir still
remains a hard nut to crack. No doubt this is the best opportunity that has
been offered for the solution of the Kashmir problem. Both India and Pakistan
should grab it with sincerity and a spirit of accommodation. They must show
broad political vision and strive for a satisfactory solution.
It would be advisable that as a first step the Kashmir issue should be freed
from the clutches of the secret agencies of both countries and hard-liner bureaucrats,
and tackled with political wisdom and foresight. The hostile propaganda warfare
carried out by the media of both countries, which has been adding fuel to the
fire for many years, should be stopped forthwith.
This writer had suggested in an earlier column that since the options of a
plebiscite, an independent Kashmir and the division of the state on the regional
basis proposed by President Musharraf are not acceptable, the only viable solution
might be India agreeing to grant full autonomy to Occupied Kashmir, just like
Pakistan which has given an almost 'independent' status to Azad Kashmir with
its elected assembly and own flag. The Indian governor, who is the de facto
ruler of Occupied Kashmir, and the Indian armed forces, which are on Kashmiri
soil to crush the struggle for self-determination, should be pulled out. The
elected government should be allowed to function freely with the full cooperation
of all indigenous political groups. Pakistan too should abolish the Ministry
of Kashmir Affairs.
The veteran Kashmiri leader, Sardar Abdul Qayyum, has also put forward a similar,
four-point peace formula which supports maximum autonomy for Occupied Kashmir,
conversion of the LoC into a soft border for easy interaction between all Kashmiris,
demilitarisation of Kashmir and a ceasefire between Indian forces and the jihadis.
MQM Chief Altaf Hussain, who may have discussed the Kashmir issue with the New
Delhi leadership during his visit to India, had also pleaded the case of converting
the LoC into a soft border. He proposed an all-parties conference to reach consensus
on a formula for the solution of the Kashmir problem. Since India is also in
favour of full autonomy for Occupied Kashmir, it is time for Pakistan to consider
this seriously and make it a basis for further negotiations on Kashmir.
The writer is a former director of PTV
Source: The
News
Date Created: 11/28/05
Date/Time Last Modified: 11/28/2005 10:31:06 AM
© 2004, Human Development
Foundation. All rights reserved.
1350 Remington Road, Suite W, Schaumburg, Il. 60173
Toll Free: (800) 705-1310 | Email: info@yespakistan.com
| Privacy Policy
|